Javascript required
Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

What Is Ribose 5 Phosphate Used for

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Published:

Structural characterization of a ribose-5-phosphate isomerase B from the pathogenic fungus Coccidioides immitis

  • Ariel B Abramov1,3,
  • Eric R Smith1,2,
  • Ruth O Baydo1,2,
  • Jess T Leonard1,2,
  • David J Leibly1,4,
  • Kaitlin B Thompkins1,3,
  • Matthew C Clifton1,2,
  • Anna S Gardberg1,2,
  • Bart L Staker1,2,
  • Wesley C Van Voorhis1,4,
  • Peter J Myler1,3,5 &
  • Lance J Stewart1,2

BMC Structural Biology volume 11, Article number:39 (2011) Cite this article

  • 5801 Accesses

  • 5 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Background

Ribose-5-phosphate isomerase is an enzyme that catalyzes the interconversion of ribose-5-phosphate and ribulose-5-phosphate. This family of enzymes naturally occurs in two distinct classes, RpiA and RpiB, which play an important role in the pentose phosphate pathway and nucleotide and co-factor biogenesis.

Results

Although RpiB occurs predominantly in bacteria, here we report crystal structures of a putative RpiB from the pathogenic fungus Coccidioides immitis. A 1.9 Å resolution apo structure was solved by combined molecular replacement and single wavelength anomalous dispersion (SAD) phasing using a crystal soaked briefly in a solution containing a high concentration of iodide ions. RpiB from C. immitis contains modest sequence and high structural homology to other known RpiB structures. A 1.8 Å resolution phosphate-bound structure demonstrates phosphate recognition and charge stabilization by a single positively charged residue whereas other members of this family use up to five positively charged residues to contact the phosphate of ribose-5-phosphate. A 1.7 Å resolution structure was obtained in which the catalytic base of C. immitis RpiB, Cys76, appears to form a weakly covalent bond with the central carbon of malonic acid with a bond distance of 2.2 Å. This interaction may mimic that formed by the suicide inhibitor iodoacetic acid with RpiB.

Conclusion

The C. immitis RpiB contains the same fold and similar features as other members of this class of enzymes such as a highly reactive active site cysteine residue, but utilizes a divergent phosphate recognition strategy and may recognize a different substrate altogether.

Background

Ribose-5-phosphate isomerases catalyze the interconversion of ribulose-5-phosphate and ribose-5-phosphate as an important part of the pentose phosphate pathway [1]. Ribose-5-phosphate is used in nucleotide and co-factor biosynthesis. As with other isomerases, ribose-5-phosphate catalyzes this reaction at near equilibrium. Two types of ribose-5-phosphate isomerases exist, RpiA and RpiB, which share little structural homology and have distinct active sites and mechanisms of action [2]. Most organisms such as Escherichia coli contain both RpiA and RpiB, but other organisms contain only one class of Rpi. In E. coli, a double rpia/rpib knockout exhibited severely impaired growth [3]. RpiB occurs almost exclusively in bacteria.

RpiB is a member of the LacAB_rpiB superfamily of proteins (PFAM PF02502). RpiB from different organisms may have different substrate specificities and several annotated RpiB enzymes act upon allose-5-phosphate rather than or in addition to ribose-5-phosphate and are thus named AlsI. Indeed, one of the first crystal structures solved for a member of this family was the E. coli RpiB/AlsI [2]. Given the important cellular role of ribose-5-phosphate isomerases and that mammals only have RpiA, interest has been generated in RpiB enzymes as potential drug targets, especially in pathogenic organisms, many of which only have RpiB. E. coli RpiB inhibitors have been described [4] and inhibitor-bound crystal structures have been determined for RpiB from Mycobacterium tuberculosis[5] which causes tuberculosis and Trypanosma cruzi[6], the causative agent of trypanosomiasis.

Coccidioides immitis is a pathogenic fungus that causes coccidioidomycosis, also known as Valley Fever [7–9]. One gene (CIMG_07932) encodes a putative uncharacterized protein that contains high sequence homology with RpiB enzymes from closely related organisms. Specifically, the CIMG_07932 gene product contains 98% sequence identity to an Rpi from C. posadasii, 89% sequence identity to an Rpi from the non-pathogenic fungus Uncinocarpus reesii, and 78% sequence identity to an RpiB from Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. We have undertaken structural analysis of RpiB from C. immitis and present here crystal structures in apo and ligand bound forms.

Results and Discussion

Structure determination of C. immitis RpiB

Given that the C. immitis RpiB contains modest sequence identity to other structurally characterized RpiBs, we attempted to solve the crystal structure of C. immitis RpiB by iodide ion single wavelength anomalous dispersion (SAD) phasing [10, 11], a strategy that has proven successful for structure determination of many SSGCID targets [12, 13]. Attempts at phasing entirely with SAD resulted in poor quality experimental phases (FOM of 0.29 prior to density modification). Attempts to solve the structure by molecular replacement with other RpiBs such as that from Clostridium thermocellum[14] yielded clear rotation and translation solutions, yet poor refinement statistics (R of 0.39 and Rfree 0.47). Addition of the MR solution to a SAD experiment has been shown in improve phase quality [15]. Therefore the partial molecular replacement solution was combined with the SAD phases and yielded a clearly interpretable electron density map (FOM 0.53 prior to density modification) into which Buccaneer [16] built both molecules in the asymmetric unit end-to-end in less than one minute (Table 1; Figure 1).

Table 1 Data collection, phasing and refinement statistics

Full size table

Figure 1
figure1

A Global fold of C. immitis RpiB showing iodide ions (violet spheres) and anomalous difference Fourier map shown in violet mesh contoured at 5.0 σ. Protomer A is shown in gray ribbons and protomer B is shown in light green ribbons. The oxidized cysteine residues are shown in sticks representation. B Experimental electron density map from combined SAD/MR is shown contoured at 1.0 σ, and the anomalous difference Fourier map is shown in violet mesh contoured at 5.0 σ. C The active site oxidized cysteine is modeled as Cys-OH (sulfenic acid) in two conformations; the shape of the electron density was not consistent with sulfinic acid or sulfonic acid, the latter of which would have produced major steric clash with the main chain of Gly79 and the side chain of Val82. The 2|Fo|-|Fc| map is shown in blue mesh contoured at 1.0 σ.

Full size image

Interestingly, the active site contains electron density consistent with an oxidized cysteine residue (Cys76) in both protomers (Figure 1). Although the exact oxidation state of the cysteine residue was not determined, the electron density maps were most consistent with two conformations of the sulfenic state rather than sulfinic or sulfonic acid. The oxygen on Cys76 appears to adopt two different orientations contacting the backbone nitrogen and side chain hydroxyl of Thr78 in one orientation and the backbone nitrogens of Gly81 and Val82 in the other. The oxidized nature of Cys76 may imply that this residue, thought to be the catalytic base, is highly reactive. The high concentration solution of sodium iodide used for phasing likely contains iodine, indicated by a light yellow color. Iodine is the most probable source for the oxidation of Cys76, which was not oxidized in the other two C. immitis RpiB structures (see below). Oxidation is unlikely to have occurred as a result of radiation damage since the data were collected in house under cryogenic temperatures. Oxidized cysteines have been observed previously in the presence of iodide ions [17, 18] and also for other RpiB enzymes (PDB entries 1O1X [19] and 3C5Y, no primary citation) determined in the absence of iodide.

Comparison with other ribose-5-phosphate isomerases

The C. immitis RpiB contains ~20-38% sequence identity with other structurally characterized RpiB enzymes, although fewer than 10 amino acids are completely conserved across these sequences (Figure 2). The overall structure of the C. immitis putative RpiB is quite similar to other structurally characterized RpiB enzymes from bacterial as well as eukaryotic organisms (Table 2). In addition to the conserved overall fold, certain other RpiB features are present in the C. immitis RpiB structure such as the highly conserved cis-peptide at residue Gly43.

Table 2 Comparison of the global structure of C. immitis RpiB with RpiB enzymes from other organisms

Full size table

Figure 2
figure2

Multiple sequence alignment of RpiB crystal structures from different organisms. C. immitis is from the current study (PDB ID 3QD5). S. pu is Streptococcus pneumonia (2PPW, no primary citation), V. pa is Vibrio parahaemolyticus (3ONO, no primary citation), T. ma is Thermotoga maritima (PDB ID 1O1X) [19], E. co is E. coli (1NN4) [2], C. th is Clostridium thermocellum (3HEE) [14], T. cr is Trypanosoma cruzi (3K8C) [6]. Mycobacterium tuberculosis contains different active site residues and utilizes a variant catalytic mechanism [5, 22], and thus the sequence is not shown in the alignment. Residues marked with an * are involved in recognition of the phosphate moiety of ribose-5-phosphate. Numbering is based on the C. immitis sequence.

Full size image

The C. immitis RpiB contains the canonical open (α,β) Rossman fold, a common fold for proteins that bind nucleotides or nucleotide-like molecules [20]. As determined by the Protein Interfaces, Surfaces and Assemblies (PISA) server [21], the quaternary structure appears to be dimeric (Figure 1) with 7408 Å2 of buried surface (12,690 Å2 of surface area for the dimer). However, based on the structure, PISA also predicts a tetrameric structure (generated by crystal symmetry) in which 17,610 Å2 of surface area is buried (22,730 Å2 of surface area for the tetramer). The tetrameric structure of C. immitis RpiB is most likely a dimer of dimers with one strong dimer and the secondary weaker dimer interaction that makes the tetramer. This quaternary structure is consistent with the two ligand bound C. immitis RpiB described below in a different crystal form, and with previous X-ray structural characterization of RpiB, such as that from E. coli[2]. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) experiments indicated a monodisperse protein with an approximate molecular weight of 80 kDa which is consistent with a tetramer in solution. DLS measurement on E. coli RpiB also indicated a tetramer in solution [2]. Thermofluor analysis indicated a stable protein with a melting temperature of 52°C. The melting temperature was unaffected by the presence of ribose-5-phosphate, ribose-5-phosphate with MnCl2, or iodoacetate.

C. immitis RpiB substrate recognition

Structures of RpiB from other organisms have been obtained in the presence of ribose-5-phosphate or inhibitors. Comparison of the active site in multiple sequence alignments showed that several residues involved in recognition of the phosphate moiety of ribose-5-phosphate or ribulose-5-phosphate are not conserved in C. immitis RpiB (Figure 2). While other organisms use up to five positively charged residues to recognized the phosphate moiety, only one of these residues is positively charged (Lys148) in C. immitis. Several other residues are small polar residues such as Ser109 and Ser145. Residue 17 is typically a histidine or asparagine, but is surprisingly a negatively charged aspartic acid residue in C. immitis. Because of the decreased size of several residues and the presence of Asp17, we speculated that the C. immitis RpiB may utilize a cation to facilitate recognition of ribose-5-phosphate. RpiB enzymes from other organisms typically recognize ribose-5-phosphate with a low affinity of Km ~ 1-5 mM [2, 22]. Therefore, we performed co-crystallization experiments in the presence of 20 mM ribose-5-phosphate or 20 mM ribose-5-phosphate with 12 mM MnCl2, which are in excess of the protein (~3.3 mM). We obtained a 1.8 Å resolution data set (Table 1) from C. immitis RpiB co-crystallized in the presence of 20 mM ribose-5-phosphate and 12 mM MnCl2. Despite the presence of 20 mM substrate, we only observed substantial electron density for phosphate bound in the active site, which presumably came from the 0.1 M SPG buffer (succinic acid, phosphate, glycine) buffer at pH 5.0 (Figure 3). Therefore, it appears that under the conditions of the crystallization experiment, phosphate outcompeted ribose-5-phosphate for binding to the active site. Addition electron density extends from one of the oxygens of the phosphate. The crystal may contain a mixture of phosphate and ribose-5-phosphate, which could be modeled into the active site without significant steric clash. Refinement of ribose-5-phosphate alone or at 0.5 occupancy with phosphate as the other 0.5 occupancy resulted in negative density in the |Fo|-|Fc| electron density map and high crystallographic B-factors for ribose-5-phosphate. Therefore, the final model contains only phosphate. Phosphate is recognized by Ser109, Ser145 and Lys148 of the active site. Some of the negative charge may be stabilized via charge relay from Ser109 to Arg105. In other organisms, Arg105 is a leucine or methionine (Figure 2). The positioning of the phosphate moiety is slightly different than that observed in other structures, such as that of T. cruzi RpiB bound to the competitive inhibitor 4-deoxy-4-phospho-D-erythronohydroxamic acid [6] (Figure 4).

Figure 3
figure3

1.8 Å resolution crystal structure of C. immitis RpiB bound to phosphate. The coloring is the same as used in Figure 1 with one protomer in gray and the other in green. The 2|Fo|-|Fc| map is shown in blue mesh contoured at 1.0 σ.

Full size image

Figure 4
figure4

Comparison of active site residues of eukaryotic RpiB enzymes from C. immitis (green and gray in panel A) and T. cruzi [6](salmon in panel B) and overlay in panel C. The C. immitis structure contains phosphate whereas the T. cruzi structure contains the competitive inhibitor 4-deoxy-4-phospho-D-erythronohydroxamic acid.

Full size image

Given the substantial differences in the active site of the C. immitis RpiB in comparison with other structurally and functionally characterized RpiB enzymes, it is possible that the C. immitis enzyme utilizes a substrate different than ribose-5-phosphate/ribulose-5-phosphate. In addition to the single positively charged residue that interacts with the phosphate, the highly conserved histidine involved in ring opening in the catalytic mechanism (His102" in C. thermocellum[14]) has been replaced with Ser109" in the C. immitis structure (Figure 4). Given the position of the phosphate in the C. immitis structure, we suspect that this enzyme may isomerize shorter chain substrates, although confirmation of substrate activity will require further structural and biochemical characterization. Furthermore, C. immitis contains another gene (CIMG_09662) that encodes a putative uncharacterized protein which contains 99% sequence identity to RpiA from C. posadasii (gene CPC735_023760). Therefore, this essential function of the pentose phosphate pathway may be accomplished by RpiA, allowing RpiB to have evolved with an altered substrate specificity.

C. immitis RpiB covalent inhibition

The catalytic cysteine residue of RpiB is known to be reactive toward iodoacetate [2, 23], although no crystal structure has been determined for an RpiB covalently bound to iodoacetate. Attempts at co-crystallization after incubation with 10 mM iodoacetamide did not yield diffraction quality crystals. However, a 1.7 Å resolution data set was obtained from a crystal grown from MIB buffer (malonic acid, imidazole, boric acid) at pH 5.0 which contained clear evidence for malonic acid tightly bound off Cys76 (Figure 5). The malonic acid refines with a C2-S distance of 2.2 Å, which is longer than that expected for a covalent C-S bond (1.8 Å), but significantly shorter than that expected for van der Waals interactions (>3.3 Å); malonic acid was built into the omit |Fo|-|Fc| density and allowed to refine freely in REFMAC5 [24]. Therefore, this structure may reflect the formation of a distorted (long) covalent bond between malonic acid and Cys76. We do not know of a reasonable mechanism for the formation of such a covalent bond between malonic acid and Cys76, which rather seems counterintuitive.

Figure 5
figure5

1.7 Å resolution crystal structure of C. immitis RpiB bound to malonic acid. The coloring is the same as used in earlier figures with one protomer in gray and the other in green. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines. A The |Fo|-|Fc| map calculated with model phases lacking the malonic acid residue is shown in green mesh contoured at 3.0 σ. B The 2|Fo|-|Fc| map calculated with model phases containing the malonic acid residue is shown in blue mesh contoured at 1.0 σ.

Full size image

The chemical reaction of Cys76 with iodoacetate is expected to form a Cys-CH2COOH adduct. The conformation of either of the carboxylates of malonic acid may be reflective of the carboxylate of the covalent adduct formed with iodoacetate. One of the carboxylates of malonic acid forms hydrogen bonds with the backbone amides of Thr78 (conserved as a serine or threonine, 3.0 Å) and the universally conserved Gly77 (2.9 Å) as well as the side chain of the universally conserved Asp16 (2.6 Å). The hydrogen bond with Asp16 is unlikely to occur at neutral pH where both carboxylates are expected to be deprotonated and negatively charged. In contrast, the interaction is well ordered in the pH 5.0 crystal. Given an approximate pKa of ~4.8, at pH 5.0 about half of the carboxylates should be protonated. The second malonic acid carboxylate forms hydrogen bonding interactions with the backbone amide nitrogen of the universally conserved Gly81 (2.5 Å) and with the side chain of the universally conserved Asn110' of the other protomer of the obligate dimeric enzyme (3.0 Å). The interactions of this carboxylate with RpiB may reflect the interactions formed by the iodoacetate covalent adduct. There is a chloride ion in the active site 3.7 Å away from the malonic acid and near Arg105' and Arg120, although this anion is ill-suited to mimic the iodide ion leaving group of iodoacetate because it is on the opposite side of the caboxylate relative to Cys76. An iodide ion resides in the same place as this chloride ion in both protomers of the asymmetric unit in the iodide-phased structure.

Conclusions

Here we present crystal structures of RpiB from the pathogenic fungus C. immitis, which together with the structures from T. cruzi[6] and G. lamblia (Edwards, T.E. et al., unpublished) are the only eukaryotic RpiB crystal structures currently available. These structures reveal the presence of a highly reactive cysteine residue in the active site, thought to be the catalytic base in the isomerase reaction and provide insight into a possible structural mechanism for the inhibition of RpiB by iodoacetate. Furthermore, these structures reveal the basis for phosphate recognition by a single positively charged residue and may indicate that this C. immitis has altered substrate specificity.

Methods

Cloning, expression, and purification

The 163-residue Coccidioides immitis putative uncharacterized protein (C. immitis RpiB, UniProt ID: P0CL19, formerly Q1DP31; Gene CIMG_07932, targetDB ID: CoimA.00584.a, E. C. 5.3.1.6) was amplified from genomic DNA and cloned into an expression vector (pAVA0421) encoding an N-terminal histidine affinity tag followed by the human rhinovirus 3C protease cleavage sequence using ligation independent cloning [25]. The full length expressed protein contains the tag sequence MAHHHHHHMGTLEAQTQGPGS followed by the 163-residue C. immitis RpiB. The plasmid is available through the BEI repository (NR-28451). The plasmid was transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) R3 Rosetta cells. Starter cultures of LB broth with appropriate antibiotics were grown for ~18 hours at 37°C. Protein was expressed in a LEX bioreactor in ZYP-5052 auto-induction media [26] in the presence of antibiotics in 2 liters of sterilized auto-induction media inoculated with the overnight starter culture. After 24 hours at 25°C the temperature was reduced to 15°C for an additional 60 hours. The sample was centrifuged at 4000 × g for 20 minutes at 4°C. Cell paste was flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C. The frozen cells were re-suspended in 20 mM HEPES pH 7.0, 300 mM NaCl, 5% w/v glycerol, 0.5% w/v CHAPS, 30 mM imidazole, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM TCEP, 250 μg/ml AEBSF, 200 μl of lysozyme (100 mg/mL), 5 tablets of Roche protease inhibitor tablets, and 280 μl of β-mercaptoethanol at 4°C. Lysis was achieved by sonication, followed by incubation with Benzonase (20 μL of 25 unit/μL). Insoluble proteins and other cellular components were removed by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 60 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant was filtered using a low-protein binding 0.45 μm sterile filter. The soluble fraction was then loaded onto a Ni-NTA His-Trap FF 5 ml column (GE Healthcare). The column was washed with 20 column volumes of wash buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.0, 300 mM NaCl, 5% w/v glycerol, 30 mM imidazole, and 1 mM TCEP). The bound protein was eluted with 7 column volumes of elution buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.0, 300 mM NaCl, 5% w/v glycerol, 1 mM TCEP, and 500 mM imidazole). The collected protein was loaded onto a Hiload 26/60 Superdex 75 prep grade column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated in SEC buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.0, 300 mM NaCl, 5% v/v glycerol, and 1 mM TCEP). The protein eluted off the SEC column in a split peak, which was pooled into two samples and concentrated to 82 mg/mL for the first peak sample and 128 mg/mL for the second peak sample. Both samples were shown by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis to be >95% pure and contain a protein of the expected molecular weight. Therefore, the two samples may reflect different oligomeric states of the same protein in solution. The sample from the first peak resulted in the crystal structures, whereas the sample from the second peak yielded crystals which did not diffract to better than 3 Å resolution. The purified protein samples were stored at -80°C. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) was performed at 8 mg/mL in SEC buffer on a Malvern Instruments Nano series Zetasizer. Thermofluor experiments were performed in SEC buffer at 2 and 4 mg/mL as described [27].

Crystallization and structure determination

Crystallization trials were set up according to a crystallization approach [28] using the JCSG+ and PACT sparse matrix screens from Emerald BioSystems. Protein drops (0.4 μL at 82 mg/mL) were diluted with an equal volume of precipitant and equilibrated against 80 μL of precipitant in 96-well sitting drop vapor diffusion format using Compact Junior plates from Emerald BioSystems. A crystal grown from the JCSG+ screen condition B9 (0.1 M Na citrate pH 5.0, 20% w/v PEG 6000) was soaked into a solution containing 0.1 M Na citrate pH 5.0, 20% w/v PEG 6000, 22% v/v ethylene glycol, and 0.7 M NaI for 1 minute, then vitrified in liquid nitrogen. A data set (Table 1) was collected at 100 K under a stream of liquid nitrogen using a Rigaku FR-E+ SuperBright Cu Kα rotating anode X-ray generator with VariMax optics and a Saturn 944+ CCD detector. Data parameters include 360 images, Δφ = 1°, 2θ = 5°, 20 s exposure times, and a detector distance of 50 mm. Data were reduced with XDS [29]. The structure was solved by combined molecular replacement and iodide ion SAD phasing. First, molecular replacement was performed using the protein model from protomer A of Clostridium thermocellum crystal structure (PDB ID 3HEE, [14]) as a search model in Phaser [30] from the CCP4 suite [31]. Separately, twenty-one anomalous sites were identified using phenix.hyss[32]. Phases calculated from SAD were combined with the MR solution in Phaser EP [30]. After density improvement in parrot [33], the model was initially built using Buccaneer [16] using the default parameters for both programs and Hendrickson Lattman coefficients and Rfree rather than Phi/FOM. Another crystal of C. immitis RpiB was grown at 66 mg/mL in the presence of 20 mM ribose-5-phosphate and 12 mM MnCl2 in the PACT screen condition A2 (0.1 M SPG buffer pH 5.0, 25% w/v PEG 1500). The crystal was cryo-protected in a solution containing 20 mM ribose-5-phosphate, 12 mM MnCl2, 0.1 M SPG buffer pH 4.0, 30% w/v PEG 1500 and 20% v/v ethylene glycol and vitrified. A data set was collected as described above for the iodide crystal with the exception of 2θ = 10°, 340 images and 30 s exposure times. The phosphate bound structure was solved by molecular replacement in Phaser [30] using the protein-only model of the iodide phased structure. A third crystal of C. immitis RpiB was grown at 66 mg/mL in the presence of 20 mM ribose-5-phosphate and 12 mM MnCl2 in the PACT screen condition B2 (0.1 M MIB buffer pH 5.0, 25% w/v PEG 1500). The crystal was cryo-protected in a solution containing 20 mM ribose-5-phosphate, 12 mM MnCl2, 0.1 M MIB buffer pH 4.0, 30% w/v PEG 1500 and 20% v/v ethylene glycol and vitrified. A data set was collected as described above for the iodide crystal with the exception of 2θ = 10°, 360 images and 6 s exposure times. This malonic acid bound structure was solved using the protein model from the phosphate-bound structure. The final models (Table 1) were obtained after numerous rounds of refinement in REFMAC5 [24] and manual re-building in COOT [34]. NCS averaging was not used due to the high resolution of each structure (sub 2 Å). Both 2|Fo|-|Fc| and |Fo|-|Fc| electron density maps were used in model building. TLS refinement was used with one group per chain. Water molecules were built that were within hydrogen bonding distance to the protein (~3.2 Å) and showed electron density above 1.1 σ in the final 2|Fo|-|Fc| electron density map. Structures were assessed for correctness and validated using Molprobity [35]. All diffraction images are freely available (http://www.csgid.org/csgid/pages/diffraction_images).

References

  1. 1.

    Wamelink MM, Struys EA, Jakobs C: The biochemistry, metabolism and inherited defects of the pentose phosphate pathway: a review. J Inherit Metab Dis 2008, 31(6):703–717. 10.1007/s10545-008-1015-6

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  2. 2.

    Zhang RG, Andersson CE, Skarina T, Evdokimova E, Edwards AM, Joachimiak A, Savchenko A, Mowbray SL: The 2.2 Å resolution structure of RpiB/AlsB from Escherichia coli illustrates a new approach to the ribose-5-phosphate isomerase reaction. J Mol Biol 2003, 332(5):1083–1094. 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.08.009

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  3. 3.

    Sorensen KI, Hove-Jensen B: Ribose catabolism of Escherichia coli: characterization of the rpiB gene encoding ribose phosphate isomerase B and of the rpiR gene, which is involved in regulation of rpiB expression. J Bacteriol 1996, 178(4):1003–1011.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  4. 4.

    Mariano S, Roos AK, Mowbray SL, Salmon L: Competitive inhibitors of type B ribose 5-phosphate isomerases: design, synthesis and kinetic evaluation of new D-allose and D-allulose 6-phosphate derivatives. Carbohydr Res 2009, 344(7):869–880. 10.1016/j.carres.2009.02.024

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  5. 5.

    Roos AK, Mariano S, Kowalinski E, Salmon L, Mowbray SL: D-ribose-5-phosphate isomerase B from Escherichia coli is also a functional D-allose-6-phosphate isomerase, while the Mycobacterium tuberculosis enzyme is not. J Mol Biol 2008, 382(3):667–679. 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.06.090

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  6. 6.

    Stern AL, Naworyta A, Cazzulo JJ, Mowbray SL: Structures of type B ribose 5-phosphate isomerase from Trypanosoma cruzi shed light on the determinants of sugar specificity in the structural family. FEBS J 2011, 278(5):793–808. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07999.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  7. 7.

    Deus Filho A: Chapter 2: coccidioidomycosis. J Bras Pneumol 2009, 35(9):920–930. 10.1590/S1806-37132009000900014

    Article  Google Scholar

  8. 8.

    Hector RF, Laniado-Laborin R: Coccidioidomycosis--a fungal disease of the Americas. PLoS Med 2005, 2(1):e2. 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020002

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  9. 9.

    Sharpton TJ, Stajich JE, Rounsley SD, Gardner MJ, Wortman JR, Jordar VS, Maiti R, Kodira CD, Neafsey DE, Zeng Q, et al.: Comparative genomic analyses of the human fungal pathogens Coccidioides and their relatives. Genome Res 2009, 19(10):1722–1731. 10.1101/gr.087551.108

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  10. 10.

    Dauter M, Dauter Z: Phase determination using halide ions. Methods Mol Biol 2007, 364: 149–158.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  11. 11.

    Dauter Z, Dauter M, Rajashankar KR: Novel approach to phasing proteins: derivatization by short cryo-soaking with halides. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2000, 56(Pt 2):232–237.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  12. 12.

    Abendroth J, Gardberg AS, Robinson JI, Christensen JS, Staker BL, Myler PJ, Stewart LJ, Edwards TE: SAD phasing using iodide ions in a high-throughput structural genomics environment. J Struct Funct Genomics 2011, 12(2):83–95. 10.1007/s10969-011-9101-7

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  13. 13.

    Edwards TE, Phan I, Abendroth J, Dieterich SH, Masoudi A, Guo W, Hewitt SN, Kelley A, Leibly D, Brittnacher MJ, et al.: Structure of a Burkholderia pseudomallei trimeric autotransporter adhesin head. PLoS One 2010, 5(9):e12803. 10.1371/journal.pone.0012803

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  14. 14.

    Jung J, Kim JK, Yeom SJ, Ahn YJ, Oh DK, Kang LW: Crystal structure of Clostridium thermocellum ribose-5-phosphate isomerase B reveals properties critical for fast enzyme kinetics. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2011, 90(2):517–527. 10.1007/s00253-011-3095-8

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  15. 15.

    Roversi P, Johnson S, Lea SM: With phases: how two wrongs can sometimes make a right. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2010, 66(Pt 4):420–425.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  16. 16.

    Cowtan K: The Buccaneer software for automated model building. 1. Tracing protein chains. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2006, 62(Pt 9):1002–1011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  17. 17.

    Galaleldeen A, Strange RW, Whitson LJ, Antonyuk SV, Narayana N, Taylor AB, Schuermann JP, Holloway SP, Hasnain SS, Hart PJ: Structural and biophysical properties of metal-free pathogenic SOD1 mutants A4V and G93A. Arch Biochem Biophys 2009, 492(1–2):40–47. 10.1016/j.abb.2009.09.020

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  18. 18.

    Pauwels K, Lustig A, Wyns L, Tommassen J, Savvides SN, Van Gelder P: Structure of a membrane-based steric chaperone in complex with its lipase substrate. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2006, 13(4):374–375. 10.1038/nsmb1065

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  19. 19.

    Xu Q, Schwarzenbacher R, McMullan D, von Delft F, Brinen LS, Canaves JM, Dai X, Deacon AM, Elsliger MA, Eshagi S, et al.: Crystal structure of a ribose-5-phosphate isomerase RpiB (TM1080) from Thermotoga maritima at 1.90 A resolution. Proteins 2004, 56(1):171–175. 10.1002/prot.20129

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  20. 20.

    Rossmann MG, Moras D, Olsen KW: Chemical and biological evolution of nucleotide-binding protein. Nature 1974, 250(463):194–199. 10.1038/250194a0

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  21. 21.

    Krissinel E, Henrick K: Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J Mol Biol 2007, 372(3):774–797. 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.022

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  22. 22.

    Roos AK, Andersson CE, Bergfors T, Jacobsson M, Karlen A, Unge T, Jones TA, Mowbray SL: Mycobacterium tuberculosis ribose-5-phosphate isomerase has a known fold, but a novel active site. J Mol Biol 2004, 335(3):799–809. 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.11.021

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  23. 23.

    Essenberg MK, Cooper RA: Two ribose-5-phosphate isomerases from Escherichia coli K12: partial characterisation of the enzymes and consideration of their possible physiological roles. Eur J Biochem 1975, 55(2):323–332. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1975.tb02166.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  24. 24.

    Murshudov GN, Vagin AA, Dodson EJ: Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 1997, 53(Pt 3):240–255.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  25. 25.

    Aslanidis C, de Jong PJ: Ligation-independent cloning of PCR products (LIC-PCR). Nucleic Acids Res 1990, 18(20):6069–6074. 10.1093/nar/18.20.6069

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  26. 26.

    Studier FW: Protein production by auto-induction in high density shaking cultures. Protein Expr Purif 2005, 41(1):207–234. 10.1016/j.pep.2005.01.016

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  27. 27.

    Crowther GJ, He P, Rodenbough PP, Thomas AP, Kovzun KV, Leibly DJ, Bhandari J, Castaneda LJ, Hol WG, Gelb MH, et al.: Use of thermal melt curves to assess the quality of enzyme preparations. Anal Biochem 2010, 399(2):268–275. 10.1016/j.ab.2009.12.018

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  28. 28.

    Newman J, Egan D, Walter TS, Meged R, Berry I, Ben Jelloul M, Sussman JL, Stuart DI, Perrakis A: Towards rationalization of crystallization screening for small- to medium-sized academic laboratories: the PACT/JCSG+ strategy. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2005, 61(Pt 10):1426–1431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  29. 29.

    Kabsch W: Xds. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2010, 66(Pt 2):125–132.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  30. 30.

    McCoy AJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Adams PD, Winn MD, Storoni LC, Read RJ: Phaser crystallographic software. J Appl Crystallogr 2007, 40(Pt 4):658–674.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  31. 31.

    The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 1994, 50(Pt 5):760–763.

  32. 32.

    Adams PD, Afonine PV, Bunkoczi G, Chen VB, Davis IW, Echols N, Headd JJ, Hung LW, Kapral GJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, et al.: PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2010, 66(Pt 2):213–221.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  33. 33.

    Cowtan K: Recent developments in classical density modification. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2010, 66(Pt 4):470–478.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  34. 34.

    Emsley P, Cowtan K: Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2004, 60(Pt 12 Pt 1):2126–2132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  35. 35.

    Chen VB, Arendall WB, Headd JJ, Keedy DA, Immormino RM, Kapral GJ, Murray LW, Richardson JS, Richardson DC: MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2010, 66(Pt 1):12–21.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements and Funding

The authors thank the whole SSGCID team. This research was funded under Federal Contract Number HHSN272200700057C from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease (SSGCID), USA

    Thomas E Edwards, Ariel B Abramov, Eric R Smith, Ruth O Baydo, Jess T Leonard, David J Leibly, Kaitlin B Thompkins, Matthew C Clifton, Anna S Gardberg, Bart L Staker, Wesley C Van Voorhis, Peter J Myler & Lance J Stewart

  2. Emerald BioStructures, 7869 NE Day Road West, Bainbridge Island, WA, 98110, USA

    Thomas E Edwards, Eric R Smith, Ruth O Baydo, Jess T Leonard, Matthew C Clifton, Anna S Gardberg, Bart L Staker & Lance J Stewart

  3. Seattle Biomedical Research Institute, 307 Westlake Avenue North, Suite 500, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA

    Ariel B Abramov, Kaitlin B Thompkins & Peter J Myler

  4. School of Medicine, University of Washington, 1959 N.E. Pacific Avenue, MS 356423, Seattle, WA, 98195-7185, USA

    David J Leibly & Wesley C Van Voorhis

  5. Departments of Global Health and Medical Education & Biomedical Informatics, University of Washington, Box 357230, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA

    Peter J Myler

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas E Edwards.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

TEE collected two of the data sets, solved all three structures, analyzed the data and wrote the paper. ABA purified the protein. ERS performed DLS measurements. ROB performed thermofluor analysis. JTL collected one data set. DJL performed large scale expression and KBT performed lysis. MCC verified two structures, and ASG verified the other. BLS is the SSGCID site manager. WCV is an SSGCID Co-PI. PJM is the SSGCID PI. LJS is an SSGCID Co-PI. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors' original submitted files for images

About this article

Cite this article

Edwards, T.E., Abramov, A.B., Smith, E.R. et al. Structural characterization of a ribose-5-phosphate isomerase B from the pathogenic fungus Coccidioides immitis. BMC Struct Biol 11, 39 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6807-11-39

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6807-11-39

Keywords

  • Malonic Acid
  • TCEP
  • Coccidioidomycosis
  • Molecular Replacement
  • Iodoacetate

What Is Ribose 5 Phosphate Used for

Source: https://bmcstructbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-6807-11-39